Page 37 - BSEd AREA A. INSTRUCTION
P. 37

BACHELOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

                                                                                     Level III Phase 2

                          The UTPB deliberates on the proposal based on criteria and recommends
                          to  the  Vice  President  for  Academic  Affairs  for  approval.  The
                          recommendation includes the approximate length of time the instructional
                          material is to be written.”

                   Process flow for review and approval of printed instructional materials
                          “The  faculty  writer  conforms  by  signing  the  Reading  and  Reference
                          Material Writing Contact and submits a copy to the UTPB Chairperson.

                          The  faculty  writer  prepares  and  submits  the  instructional  material
                          according to the approved proposal and course syllabus.

                          The UTPB reviews the draft instructional material submitted by the faculty
                          writer, and forwards to an external subject specialist, if needed. The Board
                          reviews  the  draft  instructional  material  following  the  evaluation  rating
                          system  adapted  from  PASUC  Knowledge-based  Project  for  module,
                          reference book, textbook, workbook, laboratory manual, and novel writing.

                          The  UTPB  returns  the  instructional  material  to  the  faculty  writer  for
                          revision.

                          The  UTPB  Chairperson  receives  the  revised  instructional  material
                          submitted by the faculty writer for final editing.

                          The  UTPB  Chairperson  submits  the  edited  instructional  material  to  the
                          Vice  President  of  Academic  Affairs  for  approval  and  recommends  for
                          utilizations in the university.”



                   Curriculum Review and Development

                          The list below is the summary of the standards procedures for curriculum

                   review and development in the University, as lifted from quality procedure VPAA-


                   QP-02:

                              1.  Creation of curriculum review and development committee
                              2.  Actual curriculum revision and development
                              3.  Consultation or validation with stakeholders
                              4.  Presentation  to  College  Academic  Council  for  approval  and
                                 endorsement to the University Academic Council
                              5.  Presentation to the University Academic Council for approval
                              6.  Submission to the Commission on Higher Education for approval
                              7.  Presentation to the Board of Reagents for approval
                              8.  Implementation of the approved curriculum







                                                                                               36 | P a g e
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42